Asia Spectrum Analysis

Go to's

The 'Toties'

There is a form of governance that continually re-emerges among humans that combines their need for a strong leader in a crises with their innate cooperative nature known as 'team work' that makes the Hosa the dominate species on the planet. In Man's ancient past, if they really evolved from apes, a leader would be called a 'silver back' because he had the strength to rule a herd of human beings. He would have to be an absolute ruler and this evolved into human societies as a 'totie'. This is an individual who rules some family, tribe, clan, or community by force. The Totie appears continually in human societies, sometimes as a Pharaoh or king or emperor, sometimes as a military commander of a city or feudal territory he and his family have come to 'own'.
The totie believes in political power over others as a property to be 'owned' like any other material object on planet Earth. The Silverback mentality re-emerges in all human societies and is a genetic or DNA induced survival mechanism of the past. Not necessarily an evolving process when Artificially Intelligences appearing in the 21st century can do the same thing, but humans don't need the Silverback totie if their own awareness increases.

Totalitarian Forward Operating Bases (totfobs) have always been an integral part of normal human societies and appear as tribal enclaves determined to acquire political power because they can "do a better job". In actuality, modern totfobs have discovered that if they create enough violence, they can control political power and then perpetuate themselves in power by permanently "doing a better job" repairing violence that has has done to a society of humans. In spite of many social, economic and spiritual 'enlightenments', totfobs still continually re-emerge.

Dividing countries into 'sovereign' political entities doesn't mean much. Only their hundred year long sociological timelines or their generational progressions have significance. Note the sociological conditions being evaluated here with colors depicting various human systems. About half the spectrum can easily fall under Totie control. Note that one could find half of the colors here listed in any 'country', with varying degrees of interactive crises effects. Not all strife is by nations. Many times it is the 'colors' colliding within a nation.

Definitions

A Right: A condition of human existence from birth that has been agreed to for all members of a human group.

Apdicide: Mass murder or serial killing by a sociopath posing as a political or religious activist. Individual acts that are not defined as Crimes Against Humanity or Criaghum.

Demicide: Mass murder by a governing entity for political, economic, religious, or ethnic reasons. Governmental or Warlord (Arabic: Jabbara, Chinese: Junfa) acts that meet some definitions of Criaghum.

Genocide: Mass Murder of a society by other societies while using WMD. Generally, the majority of a society must support the governing authority and are equally guilty of Criaghum.

Crime Against Humanity or Criaghum: As defined by the International Criminal Court. "are particularly odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; extermination; torture; rape; political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion."

Constitutionalism Verses Totalitarianism

Our purpose is to stimulate interest in the dynamics of constitutional covenants between citizens. A 'covenant' is some form of mutual understanding between various Cro-Magnon peoples giving their consent to interact within a common social structure. Such a covenant, even ordained by Creation, cannot be imposed if it is to be successful. The constitutional covenant must be fully understood and 'generally' accepted, noting that the American Constitution was 'generally' accepted only after the mid 1790s. That was well after it had been written and amended. The English covenant begin with the Magna Carta and took 400 years to be 'generally' accepted. The Chinese have had covenants that were 'generally' accepted (Dao?) several times, only to have them dismantled by self-seeking totalitarianists.

Societal Spectrums

The continents of East Asia, South America, and Africa are shown with a somewhat arbitrary assignment of its dominate social and constitutional status. Note that all of the societies can be broken into a full range spectrum of not merely left or right, but everything from 'tribal anarchy' to 'parliamentary democracy'. Tribal anarchies can exist within any other spectrum and so can un-constituted referendum democracy. A family of six or seven can be in either state and sometimes swaps states in an emergency. The images show the principal, note principal, political structure of constitutional governance in each territory. In those nations, less than half the territory might be considered 'sovereign' or controlled by a central authority.

Various continents shown with their majority constitutional covenants. Nations that are 'Centralist Authoritarian', 'Authoritarian Democracy' and 'Centralist Democracy' all have working constitutions that are 'generally' understood. A Middle Eastern display of sub categories of a sociological spectrum shows something quite different. Dividing the spectrum into regional areas would indicate demographic combinations of virtually the entire social spectrum.
A Current Analysis, February 2012, Central Asian example

     Various continents shown with their majority constitutional covenants. A Middle Eastern display of sub categories shows something quite different. In many cases, the constitutions are imposed systems constructed by a ruling elite. They are rarely submitted to popular referendum. Even the American Constitution, unique in the tribal world of 1787, was not by referendum. The Bill of Rights, completely non-existent on Earth in 1789, was approved by referendum after much debate. The European Union was not successful in it's recent referendum elections on a 'united' constitution because of inherent tribalism[]. The question for any nation is whether Human Rights are a form of mutual respect[] that MUST be conferred by a people to themselves in order to be legitimate. There is no evolutionary gain in Human Rights if a local tribal leader, even if 'enlightened', does not have a consensus on what those Rights are. Is it a fundamental error in human societies to impose or force the existence of Rights that a majority might not agree with from one generation to the next?

In the Pakistan region, something like 5 major ethnic entities, 53 tribal subcultures (many overlapping into Iran, Afghanistan , India and China), 8 Islamic cultures[], 17 totalitarian cultures[] and 312 'democratic' cultures [] exist. Even after a 100 years of British 'imperialist' attempts to create a nation state, Pakistan still has the usual centuries-long accumulation of anarchic conditions that prevent any democratic progression, let alone economic and spiritual progressions. In the associated diagram it is shown that some areas are more politically and social aware than others and it might be in everyone's interest to separate the anarchistic regions from the democratic regions for the purposes of martial law. Many Pakistanis and Europeans are calling for a continuation of full democracy [ ] even when there are many areas where it simply doesn't exist and never has. It might be much more pragmatic for the next fifteen year period to have an interim suspension of citizenship rights [ ] in areas that have not demonstrated a willingness to allow democracy with human rights when there is any form of local genocide or other forms of crimes against humanity. The same conditions in many cases already exist in many parts of Iran, Afghanistan and Iraq and have been met with a total loss of rights throughout the last century[ ]. The question for the entire region is: why is one person or group entitled to human rights if they do not believe in a constitutional Covenant of human rights for all?

      In the graphic, the 22 tribal areas of territory and 'areas of influence' are shown with the facilities for producing some weapons of mass destruction (WMD) plotted. The same plot could be made for almost any 500 kilometer square on planet Earth. The spectrum is territorial, not sociological, but noting that various tribal influences in the area have cultural interactions from their territory to other ones. Blue and red locations are state run chemical and nuclear facilities.
   The issue is what happens when one of the tribal organizations, who might represent only themselves, are in a position to influence the state run processes that they might consider 'resource prey' in an impoverished area [ ]. Some Totie organizations will attempt to guarantee their own control of power by the establishment of WMD locations in areas that lack territorial integrity. That is, other countries would be afraid to prevent internal Democide (mass murder for political, ethnic, economic or religious reasons by a governing entity) by the Toties because the resulting lack of control for WMD they possess would be worse than their crimes. In the graphic shown, lack of sovereign control in Peshawar and Mingora could lead to Totie tribes [ ] redistributing elements of WMD as part of their own agendas. This scenario can be mapped to many areas of the world, leaving other human societies with little moral choice but to use Democide tactics of war to prevent the spread of any form of WMD. The 'suit case WMD' will be a serious problem for the next century at least, assuming that Totie absolute control of planet Earth isn't the answer to random WMD destruction.   Eliminating the primitive lower ends of the genetic spectrum so that the Toties are gradually isolated from any ability to seize power is a better pathway.

       Possibly [ ] becomes [ ], then to [ ]?
       Does universal communication of the 21st century add something more? [ ]?